Go to ...

A Fairer Society

We Have To Fight For It

RSS Feed

Sunday, March 18, 2018

What Possible Good Are Taxpayers If They Can’t Keep Prince Andrew’s Daughters In Luxury – Well I Ask You

Campaign group Republic has called on MPs to launch a full-scale investigation into the royal expenses scandal. The call follows reports that Prince Andrew is demanding more money from the taxpayer, to fund his daughters’ lifestyles.

4In a letter to the Queen, Andrew demanded the Princesses be housed in Kensington Palace – claiming they should be on a par with their cousins William and Harry. A DEMAND by the Duke of York for his daughters to be funded by the taxpayer has been rejected by the Queen. Eugenie currently works for a London art gallery while Beatrice has been jobless since July. In his letter to the Queen, Andrew, 56, also demanded they get new pads at Kensington Palace, instead of their “small” shared flat at St James’s Palace. Prince Andrew is ranked number one as the highest paid princes for the year 2013 with an estimated net worth of $82 million but believes the tax payers of Britain owe his daughters a living which should include them living in luxury. Have they seen I, Daniel Blake do you think.

Not only does this guy think he and his family are entitled to take the food out of working peoples kids’  mouths but he doesn’t even think he should pay taxes. Back in 2011 it was discovered The Duke of York used aroyallodge complicated tax avoidance scheme to save up to £6 million in tax on the profit he made on sale of his home to a Kazahk billionaire for £15 million. Andrew sold the five acre property to an offshore trust which belonged to Timur Kulibayev, the billionaire son-in-law of the Kazakh president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who he had entertained as part of his Government role as Britain’s trade ambassador. The controversy surrounding the sale of the 12 bedroom house in 2003 for £3 million over the market value was compounded when the new owners failed to move in and left the house, built as a wedding gift from the Queen to the Duke and Sarah Ferguson, to fall into a state of disrepair.

Now an examination of the official documents related to the transaction by tax and property barristers suggests the Duke used a complicated legal arrangement to ensure he was not forced to pay 40 per cent capital gains tax for which he could have been liable.

Republic’s CEO, Graham Smith, has said today:

“The taxpayer does not owe the royal family an income at all.  We need an end to royal abuse of public funds – let’s put the Queen on a salary and fund a small office for the head of state. The rest of them can pay their own way”

“Andrew seems to think the taxpayer are there for his benefit and to feather his family’s nest. At a time of serious economic uncertainty the last thing we need is a grasping, greedy royal demanding more of our cash.”

“At an estimated annual cost to the taxpayer of £334m the royals already cost the country too much. We need to be cutting that cost, not throwing more money at them to satisfy Andrew’s vanity.”

“Prince Charles’s hypocrisy in claiming to want to trim down the monarchy should not be overlooked either. Charles wastes taxpayers’ money as much as the rest of them, whether in avoiding tax, demanding state-funded security or flying around the country at taxpayers’ expense.”

“It’s high time we saw MPs launch a full-scale investigation into royal expenses – the scandal has gone on long enough.”

We at afairersociety.uk  say it’s time to get rid of hangers on like Andrew and the rest of the crew. If we must have the position of a Head of State that is inherited then fine but let’s just pay for that one person. We are taking money from the poorest people of this country to give to a family with untold riches to carry out jobs that are so often suspect. One Head of State, one payment. The rest can live on their own millions.

31 Responses “What Possible Good Are Taxpayers If They Can’t Keep Prince Andrew’s Daughters In Luxury – Well I Ask You”

  1. 2nd November 2016 at 6:59 pm

    When England’s finance are in such a dire situation. Why is anyone considering or discussing handing out more money to said Royalty. The Queen also William & Harry actually work for a living. Also represent all working aspects of life. Not just the well paid and privileged. They are Royals to be proud of. When are we going to stop funding greedy individual’s who simply take take take from the public coffers.
    Let their parents pay for their homes and lifestyles. As parents we have to help our children and for longer know, due to the state of the country also work available. The publics children have to take loans out for university. Which have have to be paid back even though they are still in low paid employment. Schools are needing teaching staff we have a lack of NQTs Hopitals are in need of Dr, nurses due to unsociable long hours and low pay. But let’s not help our future in health and education. Let’s ask for play money and a posh house. Grrrrrr

    • Anonymous
      4th November 2016 at 6:01 pm

      Er is this England a country somewhere on its own

    • Peter Lawrence
      4th November 2016 at 11:30 pm

      The French had the right idea; guillotine the lot of them . . .

    • 6th November 2016 at 10:57 am

      Actually, I’m all for rehousing them. But only after a massive wait on the housing list, and even then they’ll have to bid for it like we do on state (council) owned housing. And even then with a flat that’s wholly unsuitable. And while we’re at it, turf the rest of the parasitic vermin out and give their palaces to those who actually need a place to live.

    • Annie
      7th November 2016 at 3:09 am

      I have to agree.. all their money is just for vain.. when you have health and education needing help, hand outs like this should not even be on the cards for discussion.. Priority needs to be put in place.. there are people starving, and no roof over their heads, these things need to be looked at first before any Royal spending for some spoilt little brats that can’t be bothered getting off their butts to get a job.. They just want hand outs.. they are worse than those on benefits.. could you imagine any of them turning up to an unemployment office asking for a benefit..

    • Lee
      19th November 2016 at 11:47 pm

      England? We fund them from Wales, Scotland and Norther Ireland, too. But you are welcome to pick up the tab.

    • Anonymous
      10th December 2016 at 8:30 am

      Oh i see its only England who pay for them, of course it is ER 1 of Scotland right enough

  2. 2nd November 2016 at 10:52 pm

    Absolutely. These parasites…

    • 4th November 2016 at 10:01 pm

      Cut them loose to fund themselves in their desired debauchery … phequing leeches!

  3. 3rd November 2016 at 3:18 am

    With the country going through brexit is it not time to have an open an honest debate as to whether we get rid of the royal family or not ?

    • Ken Long
      3rd November 2016 at 1:15 pm

      Why not. Surely we can manage a little multitasking

      • G PHILIPS
        3rd November 2016 at 10:59 pm

        I wouldn’t want to remove the Royal family, but like every business you have to look at cutting overheads in the current financial climate, The Royal family is a business, forget the prestige, respect and goodwill they bring to the UK from around the world that is an asset, think about the financial side of this business, they generate huge amount of revenue in Tourism, London is the most visited City in Europe, perhaps even the world, but it’s still a business and cuts can be made without jeopardising that business, throwing more money at it when it is simply not needed, those seeking increases can easily afford to pay for the extras they want out of their current fortunes, this is an increase in costs which is simply bad business, Companies do increase overheads and expand, to make more money in the long term, the proposed changes would not increase profits and therefore should be quickly rejected as a bad investment,

        • Edward Marlowe
          4th November 2016 at 8:37 am

          The tourism clsim is demonstrably untrue.

        • Nicole Holding
          19th November 2016 at 3:11 am

          London maybe a popular tourist destination but who said it has anything to do with the royals. I went to London last year and my choice had absolutely nothing to do with royalty. I think I drove past Buckingham Palace in a Black Cab and that was the closest I got to anything ‘royal’. What is so exciting about looking at a palace anyway; London has more exciting things to do and see that have nothing to do with royalty. Paris is probably one of the most popular tourist destinations but they don’t have royalty; they have other things to do and see. So claiming people go to London because of the royal family is utter rubbish. There are too many hangers on in that family. Should just have the Queen and the next in line being given an income and that is that. And they all shouldn’t be given these fancy titles either. Have the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and that is that. When the Queen dies then have King Charles then William is relegated up to Prince William and so forth. They should not be given titles or privileges until they are at the top working for the Commonwealth. What to Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice actually do? Why should they even be called princesses? Get rid of these hangers on and let them earn a living themselves or use their own money. How many of these leeches do we need to go around opening buildings and shaking peoples hands anyway.

    • Mick andrew
      4th November 2016 at 1:02 am

      Fucking scroungers

  4. Al Storer
    3rd November 2016 at 5:45 am

    Pointless article Queen has rejected it.
    I didn’t want President Thatcher, Blair or Cameron.
    Chances are USA are going to get either President Trump or Clinton. Call that democracy. ??
    We have enough on with Brexit st the moment. Thank you.

    • Ken Long
      3rd November 2016 at 7:51 am

      But the point is he expected it

    • Edward Marlowe
      4th November 2016 at 8:36 am

      If Trump or Vlinton is what the people vote for, then… Yes, thst is democracy. Thatcher, Blair or Cameron woild only get in with mass support, i.e. democracy.

      On the other hand, you could stick with Brenda, or Charles… Not that you have a choice. Damn democracy all you like: the British people have never elected a Bazi sympathiser into national office. On the other hand, that is exactly what hereditary monarchy gave us in the form of Edward VIII.

    • Reree
      4th November 2016 at 2:58 pm

      Trump is such a good business man (sic), will gladly give him to you! Maybe he will be of use to you. Good riddance for us!

    • tris
      5th November 2016 at 2:05 pm

      Actually one of them is being rehoused at Kensington Palace.

  5. 3rd November 2016 at 5:54 am

    It time these Parasites paid their own way or else do to them what Lenin did to the Russian Parasites.

    • Andrew
      15th December 2016 at 2:45 pm

      I thought Trotsky ordered them shot?

  6. nina martin
    3rd November 2016 at 11:27 am

    get a proper job andrew earn your own money not our job to pay for your daughters tell them to get a job as well you are not next in line for the throne its your brothers family not your stop scrounging off the state

  7. 3rd November 2016 at 11:35 am

    Royal Vermin in Ermine ‘Want More’

    Once again, the latest and the greatest in scandal-mongering hot gossip from Anarchy Central’s 24/7 Truth & Rumour Mill – with ‘ring of the anvil’ dispatches hand forged and crafted into bespoke satire to tempt the palates of all budding non-conformists, proto-nihilists and career radical pro-justice revolutionaries who carry the immortal bloodline of the rebel sons of Belial.

    What started out life in the dubious crypto-confines of the Royal realm as a bit of a squall in a teacup between the Alpha Male King-in-Waiting, Prince Chazzer, and his mooching younger brother, Prince Andy-Pandy, has since morphed into a raging Force 12 Beaufort scale ‘Hurricane’ – slopping over the sanctified barriers of regal privacy, straight into the common herd public domain’s mass media pages – with Andy spitting the proverbial dummy when he couldn’t get his own way then threatening to ditch the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha-Windsor brand name and go it alone – following in the mendicant footsteps of his wastrel uncle, Prince Michael of Kunt, and advertise himself on eBay as ‘Royal Prince for Hire – Influence Peddling a Speciality’.

    The grapevine gospel according to Fuckingham Palace’s snitch n grasser unit claims that 56 year-old spoiled brat Andy Pandy had dispatched one of his royal runner serfs with a forked stick bearing another begging letter to Queen Mummy, ‘demanding’ she either allocate official money-for-old-rope Sovereign Grant jobs in ‘The Firm’ – and thus up the ante of the tax-payer funded monthly handouts – to his moronic vulgarian daughters, the totally talentless Beatrice and Eugenie – (a skill they inherited from their ‘totally talentless’ deadbeat parents – Andy and the ginger-mingin Fergie – aka the freeloading Duchess of Pork) – plus insisting his ‘blood princesses’ – seventh and eighth in line to the throne – no longer be sidelined and deserved more fitting – official – royal roles – plus be provided with an improved standard of accommodation at Kensington Palace instead of having to put up with shitty little ten room en suite apartments at St James’s Palace.

    Apparently old QE2 Lizzie was wearing her ‘not amused’ face after receiving this demand – drafted by Andy’s private secretary and gatekeeper, Fellattia Mingerot – complaining that the dyslexial princesses were in danger of being overshadowed by Prince Bald Willy, Kate Middleclass and Prince Harry Hewitt when Chazzer becomes king – and immediately passed along Andy’s ultimatum to create some ‘royal rank’ position for his daughters to her acting co-Monarch and chief advisor, Prince Chazzer – now that her 99-year-old senile Greek hubby, Stavros, has totally lost the plot and spends all day being rude to the palace lackeys, while sucking hard boiled Werthers and dribbling down his cardigan.

    Hence Andy’s letter of demand ended up on the Royal Plant Whisperer’s desk – and as de facto ‘chief executive’ of ‘The Firm’ since Queen Mummy’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012, bent on slimming down and streamlining the anachronism the Royal Family represents into a cost effective / value for money tourist attraction enterprise, and axing the allocation of public duties for all but the most significant ‘Magnificent Seven’ members of the bloated Windsor clan – foremost himself and his chain-smoking consort Gorgonzilla, the Duchess of Cornhole.

    Such was clearly instanced when wielding his newly raised status as virtual co-monarch to implement the new order regimen at the 2012 Diamond Jubilee closing ceremony RAF flypast – ordaining it would not be performed by fuel-guzzling Red Arrow fighter jets – but rather the RAF’s herring gull mascots, Kipper and Snots – towing a Union Jack banner with their beaks.

    Thus with Chazzer being only too aware of Andy Pandy’s record for personal abuse of royal status privilege and an exaggerated sense of entitlement to preferential treatment and First Class tickets on the parasitic Royal Gravy Train, he copped the very same response as Oliver Twist did when asking for ‘More’.

    Once Andy heard his piranha-fanged daughters were surplus to requirements the gloves were off and it was ‘princes at war’ – engaged in a Blackadder style internecine turf control shitfight and at each other’s throats – trading all manner of nasty cat calls – with Chazzer referred to as a tight-fisted jug-eared Dobby look-alike whose BBC DJ best pal Savile was a raving paedo-necrophiliac – which prompted a riposte of ‘Paedo? Don’t you dare reproach me about my kiddie fiddling pals when you got a piccy snapped with your hand up the clouts of some 15-year old slapper at Epstein’s Shag-a-Schoolgirl Club ranch!’

    No sooner had Andy stormed out of Clarence House in a black rage fury than tittle-tattling royal equerry, Sir Jarvis Shatt, was posting news of the acrimonious exchange on Twitter, revealing that Chazzer’s parting shot had been to suggest the IQ-deficient ‘Gruesome Twosome’ got jobs modelling for scary Halloween masks – or parts in a Christmas pantomime – as Cinderella’s ugly sisters.

    Replying to Jarvis Shatt’s ‘Royal Rumpus’ posts on Twitter, Bev Titwank, a Croydon-based 17-year old mother of three, had this to say.
    “Wot the fuck is Andy on about, I asks yer? That pair of gorpin’ knobhead daughters of his bein’ the only ‘blood princesses’. Fer fuck’s sake, Andy’s not even a full effin’ Windsor himself cos his Dad woz Lord ‘Porky’ Porchester wot Queen Lizzie woz shaggin’ after she kicked Stavros outa the bedroom fer givin’ her a dose of the clap wot he’d caught off some slut at one of the Astor’s Cliveden soirees – probably that three-holin’ suck an’ swaller skanger, Princess Alexandra.”

    “Same as that other wet dream on legs – Prince Edward – another useless thick-as-two-short-planks closet case twat prancing around in his Masonic tutu – whose Dad woz Baron Paddy Plonket. So there yer got a couple of real cuckoos in the royal nest – along wiv all the mental case royal sprogs – like Queen Lizzie’s cousins Nerissa and Katherine Bowes-Lyon – wot they’ve shoved in loony bins ter hide the fact they’re all a bunch of inbred mutant nutters.”

    Thought for the day. Fuck the lot of ’em – these wastrel parasitic scroungers that form the bone idle core element of Broken Britain’s ‘Royal’ (sic) family. Millenniums of inbreeding has resulted in a eugenic catastrophe, both physical and mental, for when ego surpasses intellect and in their perennial state of unqualified arrogance, believe themselves to be a picture perfect Lipizanner pedigree breed – untouchable and beyond censure, to rule over the affairs of mankind and treat us – the common herd demographic – with utter contempt.

    As an earlier Princess once said, and luckily history recorded the comment for reflective posterity: ‘Let them eat cake’.

    Allergy warning: This article was composed in a known propaganda-infested area – and whilst purposely blending high octane irreverence, slanderous allegations and unbridled conjecture with measures of wild rumour ‘and’ decaffeinated public interest factoids – may also contain traces of slight exaggeration, modest porkies, misaligned references and lashings of bush telegraph innuendo.


    Rusty’s Skewed News Views (Purveyors of Bespoke Satire) – enhanced with a modest touch of Yeast Logic and a piquant dash of Political Incorrectness: a news sheet and media source not owned by Raving Rupert Mudrock’s News Corp and the uber-racist Zionist kikester lobby, committed to the relay of open source information – and immune from litigation under the statutes of the ‘Fair Comment in the Public Interest’ defence – (unless one has the audacity to dare expose, name and shame the membership ranks of Scotland’s Masonic Speculative Society ‘Nonce Ponce’ Magic Circle / Violate BD/SM Club kiddie fiddling cabal – along with their Holyrood Parliament / Crown Office sodomite / paedo-enablers and cover-up protectors).

  8. Denise Downie
    4th November 2016 at 8:44 pm

    Andrew has enough money to fund his kids lifestyles. They do no public appearances and Andrew does very little.. He should be on paid only for public duties he does and nothing more. Let him work for his keep as we the British public have to.

  9. 4th November 2016 at 11:03 pm

    Scroungers the lot of them

  10. anne kelly
    5th November 2016 at 9:02 am

    Andrew is a disgrace no one funds our children’s life styles and his daughters are not children get o job or go on benefit’s see how they manage on the small amount our children would have to live on.

  11. 5th November 2016 at 6:21 pm

    They want MPs to look into the royal abuse of taxpayers money. Bit too much like double standards. MPs are the biggest robbers of taxpayers money to fund their own indulgent lifestyles. However, why is a millionaire (prince Andrew) asking hard working taxpayers to give his daughters money. My daughter has to work to keep herself and her children, the same as I had to. Why hasn’t one of his daughters’ got a job. Is she too good to work, or is she too lazy. Whichever it is why should my daughters taxes pay for a woman who is too idle to get of her are and earn it herself.

  12. Paul
    6th November 2016 at 9:46 am


  13. Annie
    7th November 2016 at 2:35 am

    Andrew has enough to sustain his own family.. if his daughter has no job, then he needs to take care of it.. either she needs to get another job, or Andrew needs to pay to look after her, the same way that the rest of us have to look after our own families.. This is robbery.. it is not acceptable .. I really don’t know how he has the nerve to ask for poor people to pay for his daughter when he has so much money himself.. That is disgusting ..

Leave a Reply

About Ken Long

Get your free weight loss guide! Provided by Body Vision

Can't find your free eBook? Check your junk folder!

%d bloggers like this: